Nothing; both are unreviewed except by a few other participants; there is no quality control in either case on an official, considered, objective basis.
Wikipedia, generally, is far more reliable since dozens, hundreds, and thousands of reviewers contribute to and monitor articles there, and there is a mandate that good references be used – not just the first one that comes up on a google search. Wikipedia’s accuracy and objectivity are well established.
Click here to cancel reply.
Sorry,At this time user registration is disabled. We will open registration soon!
Don't have an account? Click Here to Signup
© Copyright GreenAnswers.com LLC