I think that one way or another, all non-native species have had a negative impact on the environment that they are introduced to. This is mostly because they have no natural predators to the environment they invade, so their populations are not controlled, and in turn they deplete the resources that they use at a much greater level than any other species that is native to the environment.
Not always. Not all non native species are invasive, like chrysanthemum, tulips, and orchids, which are ornamental plants that are more controlled and tend not to be able to spread beyond where they are planted and cared for. Other species have been useful in cash crops and have been economically beneficial, like rubber.
For the most part, however, non-native species tend to be harmful, as they can carry disease and/or disrupt biodiversity that the new habitat might not be able to defend against, like the American chestnut succumbing to a blight introduced by Asian chestnuts. It seems like non-native species are least threatening when they are used domestically and controlled, otherwise, we should typically assume they’ll be a danger to native species and/or their ecosystem if released into it.
It’s generally the accepted thought in scientific communities that the introduction of new species into an environment always has a negative impact. However, humans have interfered with nature so much that it’s hard to find areas without some sort of non-native species. Furthermore, a team of scientists recently studied the effects of non-native species and found that they aren’t necessarily damaging to their ecosystem.
In their experiment, scientists introduced a honeysuckle, a foreign plant, to a section of Pennsylvania’s Happy Valley region. What they found was that the plant formed a sort of mutualism relationship with the native birds- the plants fed the birds and the birds spread the honeysuckle seeds. The greater population of birds also benefited the native plants that were also able to spread their seeds further as a result.
One non-native species that is beneficial to both business and the environment is the European honeybee. Honeybees are responsible for pollinating a majority of our cash crops, especially fruits such blueberries, apples, and watermelon, which result in bigger yields. In addition, pollinators are responsible for helping 80% of the world’s flowering plant species to reproduce, so introducing them into an environment can actually increase biodiversity. The european honeybee makes a great pollinator because it’s not very picky about what it eats or pollinates, allowing for a wide range of applications.
Whether non-native species have a negative impact on the environment to which they’re introduced is entirely subjective. From the point of competitors, for example, it may be bad; from the point of the introduced species, it may be good; from our perspective, the answer may be ambiguous.
The point to underline, however, is that the human-induced introduction of a non-native species to an environment always has an impact, and that it is impossible to predict exactly what that impact will be.
Click here to cancel reply.
Sorry,At this time user registration is disabled. We will open registration soon!
Don't have an account? Click Here to Signup
© Copyright GreenAnswers.com LLC