Are there any animals that we can eat that would be better for the environment than beef?



  1. 0 Votes

    Not eating meat at all would be the best for the environment. Eating vegetables and grains saves resources verses feeding those veggies and grains to animals and then eating the animals. This is a wasteful process ecologically, aside from any beliefs you may have about animal rights. If you still must eat meat, you are right that the beef industry is the most energy intensive and can lead to erosion and pollution of ground water. Try poultry or fish, although these industries have their environmental problems too.

  2. 0 Votes

    Animal consumption for food is just a environmental problem. Factory farming is one of the largest polluters in the world. For example one hog farm in Utah record producing more water pollution annually then the city of Los Angeles. The link will explain why meat consumption and being an environmentalist do not fit together.

Please signup or login to answer this question.

Sorry,At this time user registration is disabled. We will open registration soon!