Arctic Sea Ice Nears Record Low

The National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), based in Colorado, has reported that Arctic sea ice is melting at a record rate with its volume and density declining greatly. This summer, Arctic sea ice has been melting at a pace of 38,000 square miles (100,000 square kilometers) per day, but that rate doubled in early August. The ice’s melting overlapped with a storm, referred to by the NSIDC as the Great Arctic Cyclone of 2012, but it is unknown as to whether this storm and its effects caused the swift melting, as the ice was already expected to melt. While the ice is still above record-low levels (set in 2007), there are still a few weeks left in the season, and the ice could melt further during that time. This summer, the weather in the Arctic Circle has been inconsistent, making it difficult to predict weather patterns or determine what is causing these changes in the weather.

Arctic sea ice measured 3,118 cubic miles in the summer of 2004, but had dropped to just 1,679 cubic miles by this summer. The ice melted by 77,220 square miles in only three days at the beginning of last month. This summer, 97 percent of arctic ice in Greenland has begun to melt on its surface, and the ice on the Eastern Siberian Sea is melting rapidly as well; only the ice off of the northeastern coast of Greenland has remained at a normal level (levels measured between 1979 and 2000). Overall, 30 percent of Arctic ice has been lost since 1979, when levels were first recorded via satellite.

Implications of Arctic sea ice melting can be felt around the world as ocean levels rise and coastal communities continue to be threatened with flooding. Although it is difficult for scientists to pinpoint the exact culprit of the Arctic sea ice’s decline, it is likely caused in part by the increased temperatures that climate change brings, but also by natural fluctuations in weather patterns. It is possible that melting ice leads to a loss of more ice as the melted ice absorbs more heat, but scientists consider this an unlikely explanation for how rapidly the ice has declined this year.

The NSIDC is a research-based group that studies the Arctic environment, glaciers, snow, ice, and frozen ground, and publishes data regarding the state of the Arctic. Environmental groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, 350.org, and the Sierra Club have drafted a petition to reach out to the general public and gain support for reducing carbon pollution. The petition is aimed at the EPA, which the groups want to enforce science-based regulations on carbon pollution in order to preserve the environment and mitigate the effects of climate change. The petition’s supporters are urging the EPA to use the Clean Air Act to cut pollution by restricting the concentration of carbon in the air to 350 parts per million (ppm) (down from the current concentration of 392 ppm), a move that would drastically reduce the effects of pollution and global warming.

“While carbon dioxide isn’t the only global warming pollutant we need to control, it’s the number-one contributor to climate change,” the petition says. “For four decades, the Clean Air Act has protected the air we breathe through a proven, successful system of pollution control that saves lives and creates economic benefits exceeding its costs by many times. It’s time to fully use one of our strongest existing tools for reducing greenhouse gas pollution: the Clean Air Act.”

Add your name to the petition and tell your friends and family to support these environmental conservation efforts today.

Photo credit: flickr.com/photos/gsfc/6151061573/

1

Answers


  1. 0 Votes

    The ratio of arctic ice melt by various means surface and satellite observation exceeding way over the IPCC prior projection seems really staggering. Even if darker arctic water in its vicinity its elevated absorptive nature as opposed to more reflective ice cover functioning as an amplifying mechanism of higher heat retaining and acceleration of melting its effect negligible in some cases as determining various determinants is a complex science, I think the general finding that Upper latitude of N. Hemisphere region has and will experience drastic warming, and its related impacts over southern latitudes the impact and ration of change is likely to be more benign is a observation based. Glacier melt in Greenland and arctic ice change can have some significant impact if mitigation is postponed as form of such impacts like fresh water scarcity (for agriculture public consumption etc) when the need is the greatest, and sea level rise (some coastal areas like Bangladesh delta, Netherland or other lower lying places being more severe than others)

Please signup or login to answer this question.

Sorry,At this time user registration is disabled. We will open registration soon!